UK makes commitment to tackle racism and inequality, in response to UN report

Commission responds to UN report on racial discrimination in the UK

Responding to the Concluding Observations of the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, EHRC Chair David Isaac points out-
“There is no place for racism and hatred in a modern Britain and we share the UN’s serious concerns about the recent spike in race hate incidents. In the weeks before and after the Brexit vote we saw reports of race hate incidents rise significantly. We support the UN’s recommendations for effective investigation and prosecution of all acts of racist hate crime and wide-ranging action better to deter and punish perpetrators.”
The report also find this-



“There are concerns that the acrimonious and divisive manner in which the referendum debate was conducted exacerbated worrying divisions in British society, and has been used by a minority to legitimise race hate. The recommendation that the UK should adopt comprehensive measures to combat racist hate speech and xenophobic political discourse is therefore a welcome one. Political parties need to come together and show leadership, working with the relevant crime prevention agencies.
“We also welcome the UN’s recommendations to tackle race inequality in areas such as health, education, employment and criminal justice, following our comprehensive report on this issue last week.”
26 Aug 2016 by EHRC

Source: https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/our-work/news/commission-responds-un-report-racial-discrimination-uk

 

A precedent on ‘Reparations’

Reparations
The Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, which recently won a substantial new award for holocaust victims, continues to set precedent by Michael Z. Wise
Could this be a precedent for nation-states or community with post conflict crisis? “Before the 1952 agreements there was no precedent in international law for a nation-state to assume responsibility for crimes it committed against a minority within its jurisdiction, and no precedent for collective claims of this kind. Even if nothing can call the dead back to life or obliterate the crimes, Nahum Goldmann wrote in his memoirs, “this agreement is one of the few great victories for moral principles in modern times.” Pragmatism went hand in hand with morality for both German and Jewish negotiators. ”
See report: The Atlantic Monthly; October 1993; Volume 272, No. 4; pages 32-35

 

‘The hydra-headed monster of sexual and domestic violence: a case for restorative justice?’

Okunwaye, I.C. (2012) ‘The hydra-headed monster of sexual and domestic violence: a case for restorative justice?’, Int. J. Private Law, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp.322–331.

Abstract: The article seeks to ascertain the relevance of restorative justice in sexual and domestic violence, and also extrapolates in depth its relevance with respect to Daly and Cossins’ arguments. While Daly seem to rely on her Sexual Assault Archival Study, as empirical evidence to hold that restorative justice can play a key role in providing victims of sexual assault justice, Cossins insists that the evidence is ‘insufficient’ to allow for restorative justices practices, and rather would prefer a legal reform. The question arises whether there could be a possibility for an integrated approach?