On Genetically modified food options?

‘GM’ or not? – on options

There are pertinent issues on GM foods to highlight- which first really seize my attention in conferences I attended in Shanghai and Ningbo-Hangzhou province China, on food security, some years ago. Where the world’s population is increasing significantly each decade, options for increased food production also has to be noted. The industry is estimated to have accounted for over $116 billion, between 2006 to 2012 globally.



Out of question- is allowing downsizing of numbers by deliberately prolonging conflicts through non-interventions or inactivity by responsible actors, or enacting restrictive and forceful child birth policies. The issues would include whether it’s a nutritive alternative to existing food crops? Does increased GM foods sold in commercial quantities maximise profits at the expense of local farmers? How do we ascertain if there are long-term side effects of consumption? Should we rather focus on redistribution and reducing wastage to tackle hunger epidemics? For MNCs acquiring lands to farm GM crops, are they extending a neo-colonial enterprise through acquiring vast lands or investing well-meaningly in developing value-adding mechanics at the sites of exploration? Is there a reciprocal policy in place- mutually benefiting plans for farmers and investors, researchers and regulating bodies? Shouldn’t we be looking at owning the challenge as a community and empowering grass root entrepreneurs rather than only consolidating major stakeholders- a bottom-up consideration?



And perhaps, not least, or inconsequential, how about investing in scientific research for developing preservation techniques so harvest could be stored for longer periods and for the ‘rainy day’? Chen Zhang, Robert Wohlhueter, Han Zhang in their recent article write- “Drawing from past experience it seems unlikely the technological momentum toward genetically modified foods can be stopped dead in its tracks. Or should be. The immediate advantages are too tangible to ignore or set aside out of fear of the unknown and unintended disadvantages”.
How we approach these areas of concern will vary, but strategic and meaningful thoughts I think can be raised, as the effects are far-reaching.



Source(s): Chen Zhang, Robert Wohlhueter, Han Zhang, “Genetically modified foods: A critical review of their promise and problems” (2016) 5(3) Food Science and Human Wellness 116-123; WHO, “Frequently asked questions on genetically modified foods” May 2014 <http://www.who.int/foodsafety/areas_work/food-technology/faq-genetically-modified-food/en/>; Marc Gunther, “Why NGOs can’t be trusted on GMOs” July 16, 2014 <https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2014/jul/16/ngos-nonprofits-gmos-genetically-modified-foods-biotech>

Avoiding extremes: tackling world’s obesity and hunger crisis

Overfed and underfed: global food extremes by Joseph Chamie.

Chamie’s paper draws attention to the twin challenges the world at this moment is faced with- acute hunger and obesity, and writes – “The two food extremes — chronic undernourishment and obesity — are worldwide challenges, impacting the wellbeing of more than one-fifth of humanity. Widespread chronic undernourishment, especially in Africa and Asia, has resulted in increased levels of misery, child wasting/stunting, morbidity and premature mortality.

Many have concluded that the current food shortages encompassing approximately one billion people constitute the largest humanitarian crisis since the end of World War II.”

Efforts are being channelled towards solving this crisis, but “two critical questions concerning undernourishment and obesity remain largely unanswered. What to do when millions of people, not able to grow or buy sufficient food, become chronically undernourished? What to do when millions of people put on so much weight that they become obese?”.


So, what do you think of these issue?

See full write up here:  http://www.thedailystar.net/perspective/overfed-and-underfed-global-food-extremes-1422997

 

On access to housing as human rights?

‘Housing should be seen as a human right. Not a commodity’ by Patrick Butler

In February 2017, Butler highlighted the housing situation in top cities and the challenge of modernisation as there is the turning of home construction options to investments for luxury accommodation- he appears to softly tread this issue through the lens of another observer…

consider this excerpt-
“How does it make me feel? One, too much inequality. People talk about income inequality: where it manifests so clearly is housing inequality … I see a society that doesn’t care about the most vulnerable. It’s mind-boggling to me that people could spend so much money and know that at the same time none of that money is assisting the poorest people in terms of housing. It’s a pretty bleak picture.” “
‘Financialisation’ at the expense of the welfare of poor or middle- class families? Are there progressive options for all?
Source: http://www.thedailystar.net/perspective/overfed-and-underfed-global-food-extremes-1422997